Thank you Sandy,
I am grateful she is covered. But we were just so shocked to see the price.
I was not aware they were looking at privatizing your system - I hope for your sake they don't.
Many here in the US are able to get insurance who coudld't before with our recent Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare") coverage, although many who fall below the income guidelines in certain states where governors rejected federal funds, for political reasons, that would have covered those people, are in a coverage gap.
Because of a number of factors affecting my full time work situation, I fall in that gap, and cannot afford the insurance rates. There are few resources available to someone in that position, save for an emergency room visit with a very high bill, or sliding scale basic clinics that are limited in the services they are able to provide. Some people are able to pay out of pocket, but many cannot. In some cases, people can get on programs with the drug companies to get their meds, if they are available. But that does not cover the cost of doctor bills, specialists, tests and so on.
There is a very loud segment of political opposition here in the US and there are many politicians who want to legally repeal the ACA although I don't think they will be able to do much. How do you, for instance, take coverage away from people without dire political consequences? I don't think their numbers are in the majority, but they are very adamant. A lot of conservatives oppose it on ideological grounds and want the government out of a system they feel should be private. It's the luxury of people who have money and coverage already, to be able to argue the politics of it. Politicians have great insurance. Some others? Not so much. If your kid needs brain surgery, you just want the best care and you shouldn't have to die because you don't have means. Medical bills are a leading cause of bankruptcy here.
I have a friend who was able to get coverage under the ACA for her and her daughter at a very affordable rate. So that is encouraging,
Having experienced firsthand being unable to afford care, I would give anything to have a system like Britain, or Canada, or France. Sure, there are problems to be worked out, but other countries have solved this larger issue. To me it seems like common sense but the political reality here is such that we will probably not see anything similar.
I don't want to start a political debate here (the political arguments in the US are vitriolic), just was so shocked to see the obscene price of this medication. Really, that should be criminal. it just makes me so angry. It's a day later and I woke up furious at this. 96,000 a year? (price edited after clarification) And that doesn't even take into account doctor fees, cost of testing, monitoring, and any other treatments.) Seriously? But thankfully, for people who have insurance, hopefully it covers.
A friend of mine's mother has MS, advancing pretty quickly, and she was taking some kind of treatment or injection or something that was once or twice a month and the cost,was like $2000.00 each time. She was in a drug study or program to get the drug at no cost, but apparently they stopped the study, so she no longer has access to treatment and does not have that kind of money. She has always worked, but had to stop working because of her illness, and she lives in the state that I do and is in the coverage gap. Right now they are trying to figure out what to do that will allow her to continue treatments, but as far as I'm aware they have not found a solution yet.
>>EDIT<< We weren't clear on the number of tablets shipped, so we clarified things and called a local pharmacy for the retail. All in all, for her 30 day supply (two 150 mg tablets a day), it was 7928.19 (don't forget that .19 cents). That comes to 95,138.00 per year (and .19 cents). Actually there was a little leeway there. The lady on the phone almost choked giving me the price.